foxskybird.blogg.se - Will word for mac 2017 read my text back to me

#Will word for mac 2017 read my text back to me windows 10#
#Will word for mac 2017 read my text back to me tv#
#Will word for mac 2017 read my text back to me windows#

Now, let's suppose you're reading page 4 or 14 or 421, and you want to return to the insertion point, and you don't remember exactly where it is. You can view areas well beyond the insertion point. Getting back to the insertion pointer in Word Fortunately, there are two quick ways to satisfy both possibilities. Sometimes, the spot is the same and sometimes it isn't. Either you want to go back to the spot where the insertion pointer is, or you want to return to the last edit. The phrase where you last were could mean two different things. SEE: Office 365: A guide for tech and business leaders (free PDF) (TechRepublic) Finding where you last were in Word Enlarging the cursor carries over into the browser but increasing the size of the insertion point doesn't. The space bar tip works in the browser, the Shift+F5 tip doesn't. I used the RAND() function to create a few paragraphs of text and then copied them several times to create a five-page document. There's no demonstration file because you won't need one. I'm using Microsoft 365, but you can use earlier versions. In this article, I'll show you two easy ways to do that, even though where you last were doesn't mean the same thing in both tips. You can do the same in a Word document, but that's a bit dramatic if all you're looking for is a quick way to return to where you last were. If you're reading a book, you can bookmark the spot. What users really want is to look around in a document without losing their place. That title's a bit ambiguous because where you last were could mean different things to different users.

#Will word for mac 2017 read my text back to me windows#

Windows 11: Tips on installation, security and more (free PDF).

#Will word for mac 2017 read my text back to me windows 10#

Ten Windows 10 network commands everyone one should know.

Why Windows 11's security is such a big deal.

Windows 11 cheat sheet: Everything you need to know.

The overtly aggressive push by advertisers that hurts consumers, the “kill them all” attitude of ad blockers that hurts publishers and the additional effort it all causes companies like Apple to invest trying to save us from a set of behaviours that should never exist in the first place. This all contributed to the general feeling of suckiness I was starkly reminded of whilst watching that keynote. Rather than encouraging responsible ads, they make it harder for publishers like myself to do the right thing. Yet popular ad blockers go further than that blocking not just ads with the aforementioned nasty behaviours, but even those like the sponsorship model I introduced which is nothing more than a line of text. Here I argued that people had many very valid reasons to block ads: they can be intrusive (even when not auto-playing video), consume unnecessary bandwidth, have often delivered malicious payloads to users and of course, there’s the tracking issue. Of course, there’s been aftermarket solutions to do this for many years, but that’s something you need to consciously seek out as a user and when you do, that then that causes the next set of problems…Īs I was lamenting Apple needing to invest effort into combatting lousy behaviour by websites, I found myself embroiled in a Twitter debate going back to a blog post of mine from last year about how ad blockers are part of the problem. Fair enough, privacy is important to people and let’s face it, trackers can be kind of creepy (refer to the aforementioned instance of my head appearing on an ad for an event I’m speaking at next week). I kept watching the WWDC presentation and they moved on to how Safari would include a tracker blocker. And then, just to add insult to injury, they managed to do this whilst overlaying the video on another ad, this one with my head on it! Here I was trying to show an important industry precedent related to the abuse of tracking wifi devices by MAC address (the tracking was done by rubbish bins in London, no less) and in all their wisdom, CNET decided it would make sense to start blasting an ad through my speakers.

This is a terrible user experience and I was lamenting this just yesterday as I loaded a page on CNET during a workshop I was presenting to 40 people. The new features include auto-play video blocking which I think we’ll all agree, is a good thing. Not because of any shortcoming on Apple’s part, rather how it caused me to reflect on the industry.

But it was that final offering – Safari on macOS – that frankly made me a bit depressed.

#Will word for mac 2017 read my text back to me tv#

TV improvements, Apple Watch improvements and then Safari improvements, all of which are arguably little steps forward in the right direction. So the annual Apple dog and pony show we know as WWDC rolled out this week and per usual, I was keen to soak up everything on offer that was sure to improve my life dramatically.